Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Cognitive Science

Neuroscientists show children’s brains function differently during book reading and screen time

by Eric W. Dolan
April 26, 2025
in Cognitive Science, Developmental Psychology, Neuroimaging
[Adobe Stock]

[Adobe Stock]

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
Stay informed on the latest psychology and neuroscience research—follow PsyPost on LinkedIn for daily updates and insights.

A new study published in Developmental Science has found that preschool children’s brain activity differs when they are read to from a book compared to when they view and listen to stories on a screen. Using a neuroimaging technique called functional near-infrared spectroscopy, the researchers observed greater activation in the right hemisphere of the brain during live book reading, particularly in regions involved in social understanding, while screen time produced more balanced activity across both hemispheres.

Reading to young children plays an important role in supporting language development and brain growth. Book reading offers opportunities for children to hear rich language, learn the structure of stories, build vocabulary, and engage in social interaction with caregivers. In contrast, growing concerns have emerged about the effects of screen time, as many studies link high screen exposure to language delays and weaker connections in brain areas important for literacy.

While past research has demonstrated broad differences between book reading and screen media in children’s outcomes, fewer studies have directly compared what happens in the brain during these two activities. The researchers aimed to fill this gap by measuring brain activity during live reading and screen-based storytelling in preschoolers.

The study involved 28 typically developing children between the ages of 3 and 6 years old. All participants came from predominantly English-speaking households, although some were multilingual. The children listened to two different stories: one presented during a live book reading session, and the other delivered as an audio recording paired with images on a screen. In the book reading condition, a live experimenter sat beside the child, reading aloud from a printed book.

In the screen time condition, the child viewed the story on a computer while hearing a recorded voice. Both stories were carefully matched for length, vocabulary, and content. Brain activity was recorded throughout using functional near-infrared spectroscopy, which measures changes in blood oxygenation linked to neural activity.

The researchers focused on specific brain regions involved in language, narrative understanding, and social cognition, including the inferior and middle frontal gyri, the superior and middle temporal gyri, and the temporal parietal junction. The team analyzed differences in activation across left and right hemispheres during each condition.

Results showed that live book reading produced greater activation in the right temporal parietal junction, a brain area associated with social processes like joint attention and understanding others’ thoughts. Activation in this area was significant during the book reading condition but not during the screen time condition. Across the broader regions of interest, brain responses during book reading were stronger in the right hemisphere than in the left, suggesting a right-lateralized pattern. In contrast, brain responses during screen time were relatively even across both hemispheres, showing no strong lateralization.

The findings suggest that live book reading may engage preschool children in more socially oriented cognitive processes compared to solitary screen time. Book reading may encourage children to focus on the reader’s emotions, intentions, and shared attention toward the book, all of which involve right-hemisphere brain networks. In contrast, screen-based storytelling might involve more isolated language processing, relying less on social engagement.

While these patterns are consistent with previous research showing that book reading benefits language and social development, the study also highlights important nuances. For example, the right-lateralized response during live reading might reflect children’s sensitivity to the human voice, facial expressions, and social interaction, even if the reading interaction itself was somewhat scripted and controlled in this study.

As with any study, there are limitations. The relatively small sample size, particularly when accounting for missing data in some brain channels, limits the strength of the conclusions. Many of the children also came from highly educated and high-income households, so the findings may not generalize to more diverse populations.

The researchers also noted that the structured nature of the book reading task—designed to minimize variation across participants—reduced the natural, conversational aspects of typical reading interactions between parents and children. Future studies could examine brain activity during more naturalistic reading sessions that include back-and-forth conversation and emotional expression.

In addition, although the study showed different patterns of brain activation between book reading and screen time, it did not directly measure children’s language learning outcomes. Future research could explore whether these neural differences are linked to improvements in vocabulary, comprehension, or later academic skills.

Despite these limitations, the study adds important new evidence to the understanding of how different early experiences shape brain function. It reinforces previous findings that social interaction during language exposure matters for young children’s brain development. Live, shared activities like book reading seem to recruit brain systems involved in understanding others and processing complex social cues, which could give children a stronger foundation for later communication and learning.

The results also suggest that screen-based media might not activate the same social brain systems, especially when the child is passively viewing without a live social partner. While not all screen time is equal, and some interactive or educational media may still be beneficial, the findings support recommendations that live social interaction remains important during early childhood.

The study, “Do Children’s Brains Function Differently During Book Reading and Screen Time? A fNIRS Study,” was authored by Meredith Pecukonis, Meryem Yücel, Henry Lee, Cory Knox, David A. Boas, and Helen Tager-Flusberg.

TweetSendScanShareSendPin3ShareShareShareShareShare

RELATED

MDMA therapy: Side effects appear mild, but there are problems with the evidence
Cognitive Science

Consciousness remains a mystery after major theory showdown

May 30, 2025

A groundbreaking collaboration has tested two of the most influential theories of consciousness—global neuronal workspace and integrated information theory. While neither came out on top, the project marks a major shift in how scientists approach one of the mind’s biggest mysteries.

Read moreDetails
A common calorie-free sweetener alters brain activity and appetite control, new research suggests
Cognitive Science

A common calorie-free sweetener alters brain activity and appetite control, new research suggests

May 30, 2025

A recent brain imaging study finds that sucralose, unlike sugar, increases activity in the hypothalamus and boosts hunger, suggesting that calorie-free sweetness may confuse the brain’s appetite control system.

Read moreDetails
New autism research sheds light on how exercise boosts brain function
Neuroimaging

Vitamin K deficiency linked to reduced neurogenesis and cognitive decline in mouse model

May 29, 2025

Research on aging mice suggests that low dietary vitamin K reduces brain vitamin K levels, impairs memory, lowers neurogenesis, and elevates inflammation. The findings highlight the importance of vitamin K for maintaining healthy brain function across the lifespan.

Read moreDetails
Ayahuasca accelerates fear extinction via its effect on serotonin receptors
Neuroimaging

Neuroscientists discover specific brain cells that enable intelligent behavior

May 28, 2025

A new study reveals that mice use specialized brain cells to track progress toward goals, even in unfamiliar situations. The findings suggest that animals—and possibly humans—rely on internal maps of behavior, not just physical space.

Read moreDetails
Delusion-like cognitive biases predict conspiracy theory belief
Cognitive Science

Delusion-like cognitive biases predict conspiracy theory belief

May 28, 2025

People prone to conspiracy theories may share cognitive tendencies with those who experience delusional thinking. Two new studies suggest that biases like anomalous perception and impulsive reasoning help explain why some are more likely to embrace conspiratorial beliefs.

Read moreDetails
Psilocybin and escitalopram produce antidepressant effects via distinct brain mechanisms, study suggests
Depression

Psilocybin and escitalopram produce antidepressant effects via distinct brain mechanisms, study suggests

May 25, 2025

A new study using brain scans found that psilocybin and escitalopram reduce depression symptoms through different neural mechanisms. While escitalopram dampened emotional brain activity, psilocybin preserved or slightly increased it, suggesting distinct pathways to recovery.

Read moreDetails
Psychology study sheds light on why some moments seem to fly by
Memory

Psychology study sheds light on why some moments seem to fly by

May 24, 2025

A new study suggests life feels like it speeds up during periods of personal growth and satisfaction. Rather than routine making time seem short, researchers found that fulfilled, nostalgic memories are more likely to make the past feel like a blur.

Read moreDetails
Twin study suggests rationality and intelligence share the same genetic roots
Depression

New study links depression to accelerated brain aging

May 24, 2025

A new study using brain scans from a Japanese cohort shows that individuals with major depressive disorder have brains that appear significantly older than their actual age, linking depression to structural changes, altered neurotransmitters, and gene expression related to aging.

Read moreDetails

SUBSCRIBE

Go Ad-Free! Click here to subscribe to PsyPost and support independent science journalism!

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

Consciousness remains a mystery after major theory showdown

Sheriff partisanship doesn’t appear to shape extremist violence in the United States

East Asians more open to chatbot companionship than Westerners

Frequent fights may explain why neurotic people feel less satisfied in relationships

Coronavirus anxiety linked to obsessive healthy eating behaviors during the pandemic

A common calorie-free sweetener alters brain activity and appetite control, new research suggests

New research highlights spite as a motivator of conspiracy theory beliefs

Five reasons young-onset dementia often goes unrecognized

         
       
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and Conditions
[Do not sell my information]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy